| Pages: [1] |
1. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty: Emergence is neat - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote from CCP Greyscale: Originally by: Del Narveux -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This may be a stupid question but what's to prevent the following situation from happening: Imagine fictional a...
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.17 16:21:00
|
2. New Dev Blog: Dominion - The Capital Battlefield - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Was the option considered to make Titans (with aoe DD) simply very exclusive (through some part required for construction only being in the universe a set number of times)? If the option was considered, what where the arguments against it?
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.16 22:00:00
|
3. New Dev Blog: Dominion - The Capital Battlefield - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
About the Titan's single-target DD... The effect is basically the same as a blob assigning a primary target: loads of damage onto a single target. But then, losing a couple of ships in your blob isn't going to decrease it's damage output by a huge...
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.15 23:40:00
|
4. New Dev Blog: Dominion - The Capital Battlefield - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
What they don't seem to be doing is making sub-capital ships more usefull in big fleet-fights. Why is that?
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.15 22:28:00
|
5. New Dev Blog: Dominion - The Capital Battlefield - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Won't fighter-bombers make stealth bombers kind of useless?
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.15 22:09:00
|
6. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty: Emergence is neat - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Thinking more about it, if you can choose to upgrade your system as specifically as say: more moons, more ore-belts, more missioning availability, more plexes, more rats. Then you can regulate wich type of traffic comes to your system. This has g...
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.15 17:19:00
|
7. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty: Emergence is neat - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
If the maximum income in any one system could be upgraded infinitely, then theoretically any Alliance would only need to hold one system, freeing up a crapload of systems and bringing the player density in those systems up to Jita-scale. Provided ...
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.15 17:02:00
|
8. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty: Emergence is neat - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Adunh Slavy Originally by: Harotak Instead of corps taxing their pilots (which makes no sense, employers dont tax employees), why not make it so that alliances implement system-wide tax for the space they hold Sov, ...
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.15 16:40:00
|
9. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty: Emergence is neat - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Aaron Min Honestly it seems like to me, pirates (npc) would naturally gravitate to more dense populate systems anyways. So the rat quality and count (and respawn rate) should rise as the system population rises. Good poi...
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.15 16:31:00
|
10. New Dev Blog: Sovereignty: Emergence is neat - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Sybilla Prior on 15/09/2009 16:20:33 Way I understand it, the entire list of proposed changes stands or falls with Alliance's ability to turn non-alliance traffic into a source of income. But I don't really see how. I mean, if you a...
- by Sybilla Prior - at 2009.09.15 16:20:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |